
Offline
A local charity asked me to lead a team of volunteers for an upcoming event. During our first planning session everyone had great ideas, but nobody seemed aligned on priorities. It reminded me how different leadership is from simply participating. I'd love recommendations on how to successfully lead team members without coming across as too controlling or too passive.
Offline
That's exactly what happened when I led volunteers for a community fundraiser last year. First meeting was all great energy but zero alignment on what mattered. I was stuck between being too pushy and letting everyone drift. What worked was setting 2-3 clear priorities upfront, then letting people choose which area they wanted to own. Made everyone feel heard but gave us direction. I found some really practical leadership tips at Richard Warke Vancouver that focused on finding that middle ground between controlling and passive. The key was making decisions about the event goals, not about who's right. Frame everything around what the charity needs, not personal preferences. Started doing quick check-ins instead of long meetings and volunteers stayed more engaged. Found that balancing authority with collaboration made the whole team feel like partners, not just workers.
Offline
Thanks for sharing this. I really like the idea of narrowing things down to just a few priorities and then giving people ownership over a specific area. In volunteer groups especially, people tend to stay engaged when they feel they're contributing by choice rather than being assigned tasks. Your point about focusing discussions on the charity’s goals instead of individual opinions is something I’ve learned the hard way too. I’ve also come across some useful leadership insights from Richard Warke that emphasize practical teamwork over rigid management. The shorter check-ins sound smart as well—less time talking, more time moving the project forward.