Offline
My cousin chose an apartment because of the skyline view, but later complained about overcrowded roads and a lack of schools nearby. That story changed how I look at new developments. Is it smarter to focus on fewer buildings with better transport, parks and services, or can a large number of homes still work if the infrastructure is planned later?
Offline
So this is really interesting
Last edited by Joaj (Today 2:51 am)
Offline
That skyline view sounds great until everyday life becomes a hassle. Someone I know made a similar choice, only to discover that the nearest school was a long drive away and rush-hour traffic turned short trips into a chore. It made me think that housing capacity really needs to be considered alongside transit, parks, schools, and basic services. I found this the company’s communities interesting while looking at different approaches to large developments. The balance seems to matter more than simply counting units.